Measuring Progress and Well-Being: A Comparative Review of Indicators
Author: Christopher Barrington-Leigh, Alice Escande
Date: 2018
Abstract: We provide a new database sampling well-being and progress indicators implemented since the 1970s at all geographic scales. Starting from an empirical assessment, we describe and quantify trends in the institutional basis, methodology, and content of indicators which are intended to capture the broadest conceptions of human social progress. We pay special attention to the roles of sustainability and subjective well-being in these efforts, and find that certain types of indicators are more successful in terms of transparency, accountability, as well as longevity. Our taxonomy encompasses money-denominated accounts of “progress”, unaggregated collections of indicators, indices, and measures oriented around subjective well-being. We find that a most promising innovation is the indices whose weights are accountable to empirical data, in particular through models of subjective well-being. We conclude by amplifying others’ advocacy for the appropriate separation of current well-being from environmental indicators, and for the avoidance of aggregation except where it is meaningful.
Tags: Indicator planning, Indicator selection, Quality of life, Subjective wellbeing, Well-being, Wellbeing,
Full Citation Journal: Barrington-Leigh, C. & Escande, A. Measuring Progress and Well-Being: A Comparative Review of Indicators. Soc Indic Res (2018) 135: 893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1505-0
Link to Resource: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11205-016-1505-0#citeas
Date: 2018
Abstract: We provide a new database sampling well-being and progress indicators implemented since the 1970s at all geographic scales. Starting from an empirical assessment, we describe and quantify trends in the institutional basis, methodology, and content of indicators which are intended to capture the broadest conceptions of human social progress. We pay special attention to the roles of sustainability and subjective well-being in these efforts, and find that certain types of indicators are more successful in terms of transparency, accountability, as well as longevity. Our taxonomy encompasses money-denominated accounts of “progress”, unaggregated collections of indicators, indices, and measures oriented around subjective well-being. We find that a most promising innovation is the indices whose weights are accountable to empirical data, in particular through models of subjective well-being. We conclude by amplifying others’ advocacy for the appropriate separation of current well-being from environmental indicators, and for the avoidance of aggregation except where it is meaningful.
Tags: Indicator planning, Indicator selection, Quality of life, Subjective wellbeing, Well-being, Wellbeing,
Full Citation Journal: Barrington-Leigh, C. & Escande, A. Measuring Progress and Well-Being: A Comparative Review of Indicators. Soc Indic Res (2018) 135: 893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1505-0
Link to Resource: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11205-016-1505-0#citeas